Understanding Your Customers Without Alienating Them
Monica O’Brien is a guest writer from Twenty Set, a blog about personal and professional development for millennials. This is her first of hopefully many articles on YGG.
As consumers, we are careful of the type of personal information we give out and who we give it to. As an entrepreneur trying to market a new product or service, however, understanding your customers’ needs is essential. In an age where identity theft is rampant and telemarketers and spam mail are avoided at all costs, there are many consumers who would rather take their business elsewhere than risk privacy invasion. So how can you do marketing research on buyers’ purchases without alienating saavy consumers?
I believe there are two key characteristics of companies who will be able to collect useful marketing data without losing the trust of their customers - customer anonymity and company transparency.
Allowing the Customer to Keep Anonymity
Seth Godin recently wrote a post on his blog about how consumers don’t actually care about data collection as much as is believed. In it, he writes:
“There’s been a lot of noise about privacy over the last decade, but what most pundits miss is that most people don’t care about privacy, not at all.
If they did, they wouldn’t have credit cards. Your credit card company knows an insane amount about you.
What people care about is being surprised.
If your credit card company called you up and said, “we’ve been looking over your records and we see that you’ve been having an extramarital affair. We’d like to offer you a free coupon for VD testing…” you’d freak out, and for good reason.”
Any millennial can attest to this because 99% of us have accounts on Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Twitter, and who knows what else. We don’t seem to mind, but when one of these companies started sending purchase recommendations to our friends, we freaked! Consumers are even more wary of sharing data with companies which are clearly selling to them, so how does this concept translate to retail businesses?
The key for a business that sells goods is to not collect any information that is “too personal” in over-the-counter transactions. Names, addresses, and telephone numbers are too personal as any of these pieces of information can lead to the other two. What many retail businesses are starting to do is ask for zip codes. Zip code demographics are readily available (thanks to census reports), so this one piece of information is actually very useful in marketing research. Stores could combine it with a gender value (no need to ask for that one) and have a pretty good idea of who their customers are. (By the way, I haven’t heard of any businesses actually collecting gender information, which makes me wonder, why not?)
As far as anonymity in an online business… well, there’s no such thing. Customers know this going into a purchase, but a company will earn respect by only using personal information for business purposes, like shipping an order.
Transparency With the Customer
People are more likely to give information if they know exactly what it is used for and see it doesn’t violate their privacy. If you run an online business, you should have a privacy policy and provide a link to it before checkout. Even better, explain why you collect each piece of information right when you collect it (perhaps a note on the form?) and make unnecessary information truly optional.
For example, most people have no idea why a phone number is required when purchasing something online, so they may assume it’s for unsolicited phone calls. It turns out many stores don’t intend to abuse this information at all, but rather use it to resolve incorrect shipping addresses or email addresses. Instead, why not make the phone number field optional and explain to the user why they should fill it in (to ensure order mistakes can be corrected easily), but give them the final decision.
Also, forget about the automatic email list sign-up when people make a purchase; it’s the best way to get on the spam block list. I get so irritated when I buy something online and get 20 coupon/promotion e-mails the next day, and I’m sure many other people do too. Instead, have /opt-in email lists/ and send e-mails only a few times a month.
For brickfronts, in-store clerks should be trained about the information they are collecting and the approach in which they should do so. Say a store is asking for a zip code on purchases - each clerk should know how to respond to the question “Why do you need my zip code?” The transparent answer would be something like, “Providing your zip code is completely optional and anonymous. We only use the information to better understand our customers’ needs.” People may decide not to provide their information, but they will appreciate the honesty. In that case, following up with a polite “No problem sir/ma’am” will show respect for the customer’s wishes and keep their respect for your business.
Above all, businesses must keep their promise not to abuse or resell any information collected. There is a huge advantage for companies who collect information and don’t use it to “surprise” people, but rather offer people better features and services. An example is Google, who probably has more information on people and their search/purchase habits than any other company in the world. As technology advances and data becomes easier to collect (and abuse), the businesses that will last are the ones who can earn consumer trust, and keep it.



PPC Management
Hell Yeah Dude!
Reverse Funnel System for Beach Bums






6 Comments
Justin said on January 11, 2008
I have never had a problem giving my information to a store. It makes my returns or inquiries that much easier in the future. But I can understand why some people might not want to.
The retailer should not be able to demand such information if the customer doesn’t want to provide it. But as you say the customer must be prepared for a lengthy process if they need to return something or need support.
The only time said information is crucial is when people are signing up for cell phone service, or buying a car where credit comes into account. The sad part is I have had people refuse that information for those purposes and get mad when I won’t sign them up.
There is a line to be drawn from companies for sure, but customers have to take some responsibility when personal information is necessary.
Satish said on January 12, 2008
It’s not even about not minding giving it to stores if it is CLEAR what it is that you will get in turn for providing it, but in a lot of cases I simply don’t understand why I am being asked for certain pieces of information that seem to be completely irrelevant to the situation or company at hand. And the fear of not knowing what they are going to do with your information (VS having a clear understanding of why you are providing something) is what is the worst.
Beyond that, privacy is over-rated. You can find out anything you want to know about me by 1) Googling my full name, or 2) just asking me.
Monica said on January 12, 2008
@ Justin ~
I complete agree. There are some people that are paranoid about giving out their information. I believe this comes from not being educated on how the information is used by the company to improve customer service. The example you gave is excellent - many companies will collect information to make checking out faster, or in the case of cell phone and credit card companies, for the sake of protecting their own business and making sure people pay on time.
There are also people that are spiteful and will purposely give wrong information to “stick it to businesses.” As a business, it’s important to neutralize these people and their anomosity towards data collection - to me, that’s where transparency comes in.
@ Satish ~
I think you are hitting on a sentiment shared by most consumers. People want to know why they are being asked for information that doesn’t seem relevant. If companies are honest about why they need it and educate the consumer on how it provides better services, consumers probably won’t mind sharing. Honest companies should have no problems doing this as they have no reason to hide, while companies involved in selling consumer data would have problems with this.
Thanks to each of you for your comments!
Travis said on January 12, 2008
Fantastic article Monica.
I just read an article in the latest issue of Inc. (available free online here) about Bill Zanker and his Learning Annex.
One thing he mentioned was a bar code system he’s testing to seamlessly collect data about his customers (conference attendees).
I think that’s a really interesting way to collect data. I don’t have a problem providing my name or phone number, except at Blockbuster where I always think I still haven’t returned a movie :)
As long as the info is used to better and personalize my experience, that’s cool with me.
Dean Keipert said on January 13, 2008
I think it is really about making sure that what the customer is getting is worth giving their information for. People are viewing their personal data as a form of currency. They are willing to give it away but want something worth while in return.
As owner of a Michigan Web Design Company we work with many clients to make sure that they are giving valuable information in return for the data they are asking for. We also try to make sure that we keep forms to 4 fields or less whenever possible.
I also just ran across the Young Go Getter blog and really like your content. Good Work!
Dan Schawbel said on January 14, 2008
Good personal branding Monica! You’re just about everywhere. I just viewed your blog and love the template you used.
What happens when your not 20 anymore!? A thirtyset.com blog?
Leave a comment