Internet & Tech: Don't you hate it when your timing is off?
1 to 12 of 12
-
I had been tossing around this idea 2-3 months ago... and now it's a reality, but not by my own hand.
See the Techcrunch article for details:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/two-new-shopping-lists-with-different-goals
I couldn't find the right team to get around the idea in time and ended up passing on it.
Anyone else have experienced the pain of bad timing?
Investoid - Finance and Investing in Perspective -
I think that in this period of internet app madness, any idea you have for an online venture has already been done or will be done in the next 6 months.
That may sound like a bit of an exaggeration, but to some extent, the general ideas you may have for a site, are highly influenced by sites that already exist. Most of the web 2.0 stuff is a PLUS. These companies hoping for millions in funding are taking Flickr PLUS video. Or Google Maps PLUS real estate. Etc...
They're moderations on recent trends, not original ideas. Sure, some of them will get bought out quickly, but that's a tiny percentage compared to the amount of bubbly sites rolling out each morning.
I think [url]http://mypicklist.com/[/url] falls into that same category, and I just can't see the longevity in it. The main issue with it, and nearly all of these 2.0 sites are that they don't have revenue models. Google Adsense isn't a revenue model.
When you put your financial future in the hands of random clicks, you have no possible way to determine the value of your company or it's consumers. Flickr is one of the few companies that has an understanding of the significance of a subscription or pay-per-use model.
So don't get too upset that someone jumped on this before you. I have one huge idea sitting in a stack of idea cards on my desk. I'm holding off on it until late this year or early next year, at which point I'll have enough money and time, hopefully, to get it off the ground. I'm sure someone will come out with something similar to my idea in the next few months, but my unique approach and planned revenue model will always put me in a blue ocean.
This felt like group therapy for hatred towards the term 2.0 for me. lol. Man, I've gotta unsubscribe from all these techy blogs. :wink:
Proud Partner of YGG -
I guess we disagree on this particular venture, but I agree with you that there's an explosion in online companies right now doing anything and everything. Most of these are at best features that will not last long.
However, I do see value in what mypicklist is trying to do. They're not trying to live off of adsense, they're trying to compete with adwords/adsense by giving people the power to create their own advertisements through personal product recommendations and get paid when other people make purchases and/or click through to a retailer's site based on their recommendations. Several benefits include:
a) No lacklustre contextual ads - these are pinpointed by the author for the place they insert them (eg. article on new gizmo contains picture and link to retailer with gizmo for sale). Guarantees relevance much better than contextual ads.
b) Trust factor - as has been discussed elsewhere (see http://www.micropersuasion.com/2005/12/2006_trends_to_.html , http://www.genuinevc.com/archives/2006/02/musing_on_socia.htm for details) people in general and more willing to listen to soft sells from people they know than click so some anonymous form of advertising. Leveraging this entails better click-to-purchase rates and higher sales. Thus there's value in what they're offering for the advertiser.
c) Unobstrusiveness. This type of advertising has the potential to be embedded in online conversations without being annoying like the intellitext-type advertisings. If I'm interested in a particular shoe, I would be more than happy to click through to a retailer who can provide more specs and details on it, and am more likely to make a purchase once I'm there.If they open up their model like Google has with adwords (eg. auctions to be placed for particular products), or if they also have a built in price comparison feature section like CNET, then they have a business model that is both sustainable and in a large growth area.
Investoid - Finance and Investing in Perspective -
I appologize if you took it that I disliked your idea. Based upon the brief about us page on the mypicklist site, I didn't notice anything about a revenue sharing system, and I didn't read the techcrunch article. It's a shame it's still in invite only mode, as I'd like to dive into the idea a little further.
Based upon your description/clarification, I can't see why you're not running with this idea. Put a bit of a spin on it, or pick your niche (maybe just entertainment products), and get it going within the next 90 days.
And be sure to share a review of mypicklist with me and YGG if you happen to get an invite.
Proud Partner of YGG -
No worries - sorry if I came off sounding offended. It's fine if you dislike the concept, I was just trying to state why I thought it was a good idea.
I do like the opportunity, but I don't like starting from behind unless I feel like I have a strong team with me that can surpass what competition is out there. I pitched this idea to my existing team and contacts and got little support/interest, so it got moved down the idea pile. Now I'm busy looking at other ventures, so I'll have to pass on this one.
Investoid - Finance and Investing in Perspective -
I wouldn't worry about starting from behind. The key is, as jimmiejo said, putting your own spin on it and running with it.
Proud founder of YGG -
Thanks for the encouragement. I worry about starting from behind depending on the opportunity. As the Techcrunch artile mentioned, that is one idea that can be easily copied, which will likely lead to a plethora of similar sites. If that occurs, you need a couple of things working for you:
a) You have resources to attract quality advertisers
b) You have a unique spin/angle than can lead to a sustainable advantage
c) You can get your name out there above the crowd (through whatever marketing means available).
d) First mover advantage so you build a critical mass that makes it easier to attract each additional customer and/or user.I'd rather spend my time looking at coming from behind on opportunities that have higher barriers to entry but similar rewards.
Investoid - Finance and Investing in Perspective -
Do it, and I will get you on TechCrunch...
-
Hey rdewey,
Proud Partner of YGG
What's your connection to TechCrunch? -
Well ... I was in a chatroom awhile back and was chatting with Mike Arrington (the chief editor of TechCrunch). We were throwing ideas around and whatnot and kind of developed an "e-friendship" if you will. Now we generally talk via e-mail...
Generally, if I find a really neat or nifty new "web 2.0" type of service, I will pass it along to Mike and he'll write about it. You can also submit it the "correct" way here: http://www.techcrunch.com/submit-profile
-
Oh that's cool. Developing "e-friendships" with influential people is a great asset in this digital age of business.
Proud Partner of YGG -
[quote="rdewey"]Do it, and I will get you on TechCrunch...[/quote]
Can I bank that for a future endevaour? :D
Provided you think it's cool of course.
Investoid - Finance and Investing in Perspective
1 to 12 of 12










